Difference between software and hardware raid 10 if the. There is great software raid support in linux these days. Plus, software raid permits users to reconfigure your arrays without being restricted by the hardware raid controller. Raid redundant array of independent disks is one of the popular data storage virtualization technology.
How to use mdadm linux raid a highly resilient raid solution. Feb 28, 2018 raid redundant array of independent disks is one of the popular data storage virtualization technology. The difference is not big between the expensive hw raid controller and linux sw raid. My experience with hardware and fake hardware raid is that as long as you stay with the same vendor, the raid metadata will be recognized ive seen this when moving drives between various hp, areca and lsi hardware raid controllers, and with intel, amd and even via hostraid i was pretty surprised when i connected a 250gb hard drive from some old amd desktop box to a hp g1 microserver, and.
Favoring hardware raid over software raid comes from a time when. A redundant array of inexpensive disks raid allows high levels of storage reliability. Flexibility is the key advantage of an open source software raid, like linux mdadm. Or raid 1 if you only need the speedcapacity of a single pair. Windows software raid vs hardware raid 10 posts arlesterc. Running raid or not makes no difference to the chipset.
Microsoft storage spaces is hot garbage for parity storage. The promise controller is pretty fast with its iop333 cpu in linux, from the benchmarks ive seen. These results today were rather mixed, but keep in mind this was just looking at the outofthebox performance for each of these linux raid implementations across four consumer grade. Linux software raid listed raid6 as beta is that still the case. Motherboard raid, also known as fake raid, is almost always merely biosassisted software raid, implemented in firmware and is closedsource, proprietary, nonstandard, and often buggy, and almost always slower than the timetested and reliable software raid found in linux. Imho, im a big fan of kernel developers non directly related to zfs, so i really prefere mdadm to hardware raid. By contrast, on a core i7 using linux software raid. Obviously, this isnt going to happen in a home server. Soft possibly the longest running battle in raid circles is which is faster, hardware raid or software raid. Comparing hardware raid vs software raid deals with how the. Before raid was raid, software disk mirroring raid 1 was a huge profit generator for system vendors, who sold it as an addon to their operating systems.
I have a zfs raid 10 software raid as my primary storage setup and the read speeds i get are more than enough to saturate my gigabit ethernet. Linux software raid mdadm testing is a continuation of the earlier standalone benchmarks. Software vs bios vs hardware raid ars technica openforum. Software raid virtually belongs to operating system. On the software side, todays software raid is superfast at least with linux and. I still prefer having raid done by some hw component that operates independently of the os. You could also go with hardware raid card in raid 0, and accept the risks for a 33% performance gain at a risk factor of 4. The comparison of these two competing linux raid offerings were done with two ssds of raid0 and raid1 and then four ssds using raid0, raid1, and raid10 levels. A single drive provides a read speed of 85 mbs and a write speed of 88 mbs. We recommend linux software raid, optionally, with lvm. For raid 5 or 6, parity calculations are still done on the cpu in this configuration. Now, lets see how windows raid0 stacks up to actual hardware raid. Raid1, raid5, raid6, or raid10 is the stuff you should. Jul 06, 2011 reasons for using software raid versus a hardware raid setup.
Certainly with raid 6, hardware raid processors can start to become a bottleneck by the time you get to 812 drives. By red squirrel raid intro before we start, lets first start by a quick introduction to what raid is, and why you should use it. Hardware and software raid are two different worlds. Jun, 2016 comparing hardware raid vs software raid setups deals with how the storage drives in a raid array connect to the motherboard in a server or pc, and the management of those drives. Those tests were done using the btrfs builtin raid capabilities while today are some comparison tests against those numbers when using the linux software raid setup via mdadm. Lastly, the postgresql results were competitive for the most part except during raid1 where the mdadm configured raid arrays were much slower. Raid stands for redundant array of inexpensive disks. Hardware raid will cost more, but it will also be free of software raid s. While a file server setup to use software raid would likely sport a quad core cpu with 8 or 16gb of ram, the relative differences in performance. Bsd opensolaris and linux raid software drivers are open source.
If properly configured, theyll be another 30% faster. The only way that fake raid stresses the chipset is from the io, nothing more, nothing less. Rather than software vs hardware raid, the different behaviors are due to the presence or absence of a powerloss protected cache. What is the difference between a software and hardware raid. It is used to improve disk io performance and reliability of your server or workstation. This table summarizes the key differences between hardware and software raids. I have a raid controller that only supports mirrored and stripped raid sets, id like to run my hyperv virtual machines and store the. In these cases, you plug the drives into the raid controller just like you would a scsi controller, but then you add them to the raid controllers configuration, and the operating system never knows the difference. Hardware raid will cost more, but it will also be free of software raids. Jul 07, 2009 a redundant array of inexpensive disks raid allows high levels of storage reliability. Fake raid is like a software raid that you can boot directly off of, but thats about it.
Scott lowe responds to a techrepublic discussion and one members raid dilemma. Windows raid vs intel rst vs raidz vs hardware raid. With cheaper hardware raid you can also lose data if theres a power outage. But it is worth pointing out, that even topoftherange hardware raid cards max out at about 800 mbs write in raid 6.
Ive been hoping other people would post with some experience, because im in the middle of a decision and am leaning toward software but just basically fear the unknown. I ran the benchmarks using various chunk sizes to see if that had an effect on either hardware or. After many years of running software raid setups in linux ive never run into a bug that caused data loss. Here are some tips on raid levels and some feedback on the software vs. Therefore both are susceptible to bugs in software. It is still software but running on a dedicated controller. You can benchmark the performance difference between running a raid using the linux kernel software raid and a hardware raid card. I originally thought to do software raid 5 with 4 disks, but i read software raid has serious performance issues when it has to calculate write parity so it dawned on me. Oct 30, 2015 now, lets see how windows raid0 stacks up to actual hardware raid.
So 4 300 gb sas 15,000 rpm drives in a raid 5 array, will give you 900gb of space and blazing fast disk access. Dedicated hardware controller doing the processing vs. Linux disks utility benchmark is used so we can see the performance graph. Difference between hardware raid and software raid.
Software raid6 vs hardware all i can find is vague, conflicting comments with nothing to back them up. Also, true hardware raid controller are often rather expensive, so if someone customized the system, then it is very likely that choosing a hardware raid setup made a very noticeable change in the computers price. All drives are attached to the highpoint controller. It is a way to virtualize multiple, independent hard disk drives into one or more arrays to improve performance, capacity and reliability. Comparing hardware raid vs software raid setups deals with how the storage drives in a raid array connect to the motherboard in a server or pc, and the management of those drives. The hw raid was a quite expensive usd 800 adaptec sas31205 pci express 12sataport pcie x8 hardware raid card. With software raid your data can be split across different enclosures for complete redundancy one can completely stop working and your data is still ok.
Windows raid vs intel rst vs raid z vs hardware raid. My own tests of the two alternatives yielded some interesting results. Better performance, especially in more complex raid configurations. But the real question is whether you should use a hardware raid solution or a software raid solution. How to setup software raid for a simple file server on ubuntu. Software raid, as you might already know, is usually builtin on your os and unlike a hardware raid, you will need to spend a little extra on a controller card. Jul 15, 2008 by ben martin in testing both software and hardware raid performance i employed six 750gb samsung sata drives in three raid configurations 5, 6, and 10. The toms hardware guide toms goes raid5 is an oldie but a goody exhaustive article about the subject, which i personally use as reference, however take the benchmarks with a grain of salt as it is talking about windows implementation of software raid as with everything else, im sure linux. Theyre expensive, the software to manage them tends to be really awful, and it make portability of drives a problem. I have been using raid in linux for many years using mdadm, which is available for. It combines multiple inexpensive, small disk drives into an array of disks in order to provide redundancy, lower latency maximizing the chanc. But to appease the powers that be, i have explained the two below hardware raid is when you have a dedicated controller to do the work for you. Hardware redundant array of inexpensive disks raid and software raid are two main ways for setting up raid system. May 23, 2010 all drives are attached to the highpoint controller.
Two disks, sata 3, hardware raid 0 hardware raid 0. But with budget favoring the software raid, those wanting optimum performance and efficiency of raid will have to go with the hardware raid. I am wondering if anyone has done any benchmarks or tests regarding the performance difference of 2 ssd raid1 on software raid vs hardware raid. In my case the setup will be used for a website doing heavy io readwriteimages with a big db. Theres nothing inherently wrong with cpuassisted aka software raid, but you should use the software raid that. Oct 25, 20 i personally avoid marvell integrated raid like the plague due to extremely poor performance worse by far than windows raid, but some of their actual hardware solutions are alright. With software raid, i can pull drives out of one system and put them into another, and voila, the volume is there. Software vs hardware raid performance and cache usage server. Ive actually had up to 3 hd movies streaming off the array simultaneously with no issues and not even putting a dent in what the setup can do. We list the pros and cons of hardware vs software raid to help you decide. Please no comments on changing oses andor hardware. If you are familiar with raid, you may skip to the 2nd page of this article. You can easily move disks from a failed enclosure to a new one, and all your data is preserved. A raid can be deployed using both software and hardware.
This is a method of improving the performance and reliability of your storage media by using multiple drives. I personally avoid marvell integrated raid like the plague due to extremely poor performance worse by far than windows raid, but some of their actual hardware solutions are alright. Regarding linux software raid, i have gentoo linux em64t latest version compiled with cflags of marchcorei7avx mtunecorei7avx and after a complete recompile tuned for this platform, including the gcc4. Software raid 6 vs hardware all i can find is vague, conflicting comments with nothing to back them up. In most cases, mainstream users are able to configure raid 0, 1, 5, and 10 arrays using their motherboards builtin sata ports and a little bit of software, yielding reasonable performance. The controller is not used for raid, only to supply sufficient sata ports. Plug them in and they behave like a big and fast disk.
For raid5 linux was 30 % faster 440 mbs vs 340 mbs for reads. But with budget favoring the software raid, those wanting optimum performance and. Solved using both hardware and software raid together. Side by side, intel % change vs software raid 0 intel performance increase over microsoft. The drives are configured, so that the data is either divided between disks to distribute load, or duplicated to ensure that it can be recovered once a disk fails. Since you mention server most likely there is hardware raid present. May 24, 2005 scott lowe responds to a techrepublic discussion and one members raid dilemma. The linux kernel contains an md driver that allows the raid solution to be completely hardware independent. Maybe with linux software raid and xfs you would see more benifit. In testing both software and hardware raid performance i employed six 750gb samsung sata drives in three raid configurations 5, 6, and 10. Software raid is a type of raid implementation that utilizes operating systembased capabilities to construct and deliver raid services.
Windows software raid vs hardware raid ars technica. The hardware raid card apple sells will run sas drives, which are much faster drives. The terms hardware raid and software raid are very misleading as all raid controllers do raid using software. In a hardware raid setup, the drives connect to a special raid controller inserted in a fast pciexpress pcie slot in a motherboard. Raid controllers also come in the form of cards that act like a scsi controller to the operating system but handle all of the actual drive communications themselves. So it looks like hardware raid 10 is the winner for windows setup providing you can replace the card in event of failure, and software raid 10 is a viable option for linux etc. Hardware raid controllers appear in this list, but fakeraid implementations do not. Raid stands for redundant array of independent disks.
1663 746 910 1035 992 1312 1313 1182 396 1013 101 1104 1029 1129 96 1218 929 717 28 847 847 1627 221 705 753 1146 851 877 302 761 472 71 427 964